Friday, March 13, 2026
Trusted by millions worldwide
IEA oil reserve release 2026 | Strait of Hormuz oil blockade | Brent crude oil price Iran war | US Strategic Petroleum Reserve capacity | Goldman Sachs oil forecast 2026
By Senior Energy Correspondent | Washington / London | March 1, 2026 | Sources: Bloomberg, PBS NewsHour, CBS News, Axios, Newsweek, US Dept. of Energy, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs
Key Highlights
President Trump authorised the release of 172 million barrels of oil from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve on March 11, 2026 deploying America’s largest emergency energy tool in response to a oil price shock triggered by the ongoing Iran war. The Trump SPR release oil price 2026 decision arrived as Brent crude, the global benchmark, climbed back above $100 per barrel an 8% overnight surge that occurred on the same night the announcement was made.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright confirmed the release in an official Department of Energy statement Wednesday evening. The oil will take approximately 120 days to deliver at planned discharge rates, meaning the first barrels reach US refineries no earlier than mid-July. Furthermore, the US release forms part of a broader coordinated intervention: 32 member nations of the International Energy Agency unanimously agreed to release a combined 400 million barrels of oil and refined products the largest such action in the agency’s more than 50-year history.
Trump, speaking to reporters during a visit to Ohio, framed the decision simply. He said the administration would ‘reduce it a little bit, and that brings the prices down,’ adding that he had filled the reserve before and would do so again. The market’s immediate response suggested investors were unconvinced.
The US Strategic Petroleum Reserve currently holds approximately 415 million barrels around 58% of its authorised maximum capacity of 714 million barrels. Releasing 172 million barrels draws down 41% of what remains, leaving roughly 243 million barrels in reserve one of the lowest levels in decades if the full release proceeds as planned.
Wright stated that the US has arranged to replenish those reserves with approximately 200 million barrels within one year 20% more than drawn down and described the replenishment as carrying no direct cost to taxpayers. However, that promise carries a significant assumption: that global oil prices will have normalised sufficiently by the time those purchases are made. With Goldman Sachs analysts projecting a $150 per barrel scenario through end of March, that assumption requires the Iran war and the Hormuz blockade to end swiftly.

The 400 million barrel IEA coordination represents an impressive demonstration of allied economic solidarity. Thirty-two nations acted unanimously a geopolitical signal as much as a market intervention. Collectively, IEA member nations hold emergency stockpiles exceeding 1.2 billion barrels, meaning the release draws on roughly one-third of available reserves.
However, the underlying arithmetic is unforgiving. Four hundred million barrels delivered over 120 days equates to approximately 3.3 million barrels per day of additional market supply. The Strait of Hormuz, by contrast, normally carries approximately 20 million barrels of oil per day about one-fifth of total global seaborne crude trade. Iran has effectively shut the waterway since Operation Epic Fury began on February 28. Consequently, the IEA release addresses, at best, around 16% of the daily supply gap the blockade has created.
JPMorgan Chase commodities analysts were direct in their assessment, stating that the policy measures may have limited impact on oil prices unless safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz is assured. Historically, emergency SPR-style releases have peaked at around 1.4 million barrels per day a rate that would address less than 10% of the Hormuz shortfall. That mismatch explains why the market shrugged.
Brent crude was trading below $70 per barrel before the Iran war began on February 28. It briefly spiked to nearly $120 as Iran retaliated by closing the Strait of Hormuz. Subsequently, prices dipped toward $90 when Trump publicly suggested the conflict could end soon then climbed back above $100 after the SPR announcement, according to Newsweek’s market data.
Nicholas Mulder, a professor of history at Cornell University who studies the economic effects of wars and sanctions, told CBS News that the SPR is not a cure for the underlying problem. The war is driving up prices on the world market, Mulder noted, and there is no easy exit. The SPR can help at the margins but it cannot reopen a blocked strait.

The Strait of Hormuz the narrow waterway off Iran’s southwestern coast carries approximately one-fifth of all global seaborne oil trade on any given day. Since February 28, Iran’s military has declared commercial tankers using the waterway legitimate targets. Consequently, insurers, shipping companies, and oil traders have pulled back from the region regardless of reserve releases.
On March 12, the UK’s maritime trade monitoring agency reported at least three additional commercial vessels struck by projectiles in and around the strait. US Navy CENTCOM operations have destroyed 16 Iranian fast-attack craft and minelayers in 72 hours — but the strait remains partially closed. Iran’s IRGC naval commander stated that any vessel seeking to transit the waterway must first obtain Iran’s approval.
As long as that threat remains credible and Iran retains the drone and missile capacity to act on it no insurance underwriter will cover a commercial tanker transiting the strait. Moreover, no amount of barrels released from underground caverns in Texas or Louisiana can compensate for 20 million barrels per day physically unable to reach global markets. That is the structural problem no SPR release can solve.
The closest modern parallel to the current reserve release is the 2022 intervention following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, when the Biden administration released 180 million barrels over six months. That release helped stabilise markets within weeks and the political irony is not lost on observers: Trump, who sharply criticised Biden’s 2022 drawdown, is now deploying the same tool at comparable scale.
However, the situations are structurally different. In 2022, Russian oil was disrupted but not physically blocked it could be rerouted, albeit slowly, to alternative buyers in Asia. In 2026, the Strait of Hormuz is physically interdicted. There is no pipeline capable of replacing 20 million barrels per day of Hormuz throughput. The oil simply cannot move. Furthermore, the Biden-era release succeeded partly because global demand was still recovering post-COVID; today’s demand is near peak levels.
The economic and political dimensions of the SPR announcement are inseparable. Trump built his 2024 campaign on an explicit pledge to bring energy costs down. His administration’s own war has now injected geopolitical risk directly into the global oil price and American consumers are paying the result at the pump.
US gas prices now average $3.57 per gallon nationally up more than 50 cents since February 28. Prices exceed $3 in every US state, according to the American Automobile Association. Republican strategists have publicly acknowledged that offsetting fuel price increases is critical ahead of the November 2026 midterm elections.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer responded to the announcement with a pointed statement, arguing that Trump had ‘already created a lot more problems than this will solve’ citing the Hormuz blockade and what he called a ‘poorly planned and reckless war.’ The SPR announcement buys political time and sends a signal of action. Whether it moves the underlying energy market depends entirely on one factor Washington does not control: whether the Strait of Hormuz reopens.

Wall Street’s reaction to the SPR announcement reinforced what the market already implied. Goldman Sachs analysts maintained their $150 per barrel scenario as an active projection through end of March 2026, noting that the 120-day delivery timeline means the first SPR barrels will not reach refineries until mid-July at the earliest. JPMorgan maintained its $130 forecast through Q2.
The banks’ assessments share a common thread: the SPR addresses supply at the margin but cannot substitute for Hormuz throughput. Until the waterway reopens through a ceasefire, a diplomatic agreement, or military coercion the fundamental supply deficit persists. Additionally, the replenishment promise itself carries market risk: if the US returns to buy 200 million barrels on the open market while prices remain elevated, the purchasing exercise itself could support higher prices rather than deflate them.
The Trump SPR release oil price 2026 intervention is historically significant 172 million barrels drawn from US reserves, coordinated with 32 IEA nations releasing 400 million barrels collectively. On paper, it is the most ambitious emergency energy market intervention ever executed. In practice, the market looked at it, factored in the math, and kept climbing.
The reason is simple. The Strait of Hormuz carries 20 million barrels per day. The peak daily output of the coordinated SPR release adds roughly 3.3 million barrels per day. The gap between those two numbers approximately 16.7 million barrels per day the gap that determines global oil prices for as long as the war continues. Furthermore, the 120-day delivery timeline ensures the first barrels don’t arrive until summer, while Goldman Sachs projects $150 per barrel scenarios active through end of March.
Consequently, the SPR release accomplishes two things: it signals political seriousness, and it buys time. What it cannot do is substitute for a functioning Strait of Hormuz. The only policy tool capable of bringing oil prices durably back below $80 is the one that requires ending or decisively winning the war. Until that outcome arrives, every barrel released from Texas limestone caverns is fighting the tide.