Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Trusted by millions worldwide
The US jobs report for February 2026 delivered one of the worst labor market readings in recent memory and the Iran war is making it nearly impossible to respond. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 in February, shattering economist forecasts of a 59,000 gain and marking the third job loss in five months. Unemployment climbed to 4.4%. With oil prices surging past $119 a barrel in the wake of the Iran conflict, the Federal Reserve now faces a policy dilemma it has no clean answer to.
The headline figure alone tells a grim story. Economists surveyed by LSEG had expected the economy to add 59,000 jobs. Instead, it shed 92,000 — a miss of more than 150,000 positions. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.4%, slightly above the 4.3% forecast, reaching its highest point in over a year.
Revisions made the picture even darker. December’s payroll total was revised from a gain of 48,000 to a loss of 17,000 — a swing of 65,000 jobs. January was revised down a further 4,000. In total, the economy had 69,000 fewer jobs than previously reported. Over the past several months, the US has averaged fewer than 5,000 new jobs per month — a pace that would have been unthinkable two years ago.
Long-term unemployment also worsened. The average duration of joblessness reached 25.7 weeks — the longest stretch since December 2021. For workers caught in that pipeline, a strong monthly headline would offer little comfort.

The largest single contributor to February’s job loss was health care, which shed 28,000 positions. The primary cause was a strike at Kaiser Permanente affecting more than 30,000 workers across California and Hawaii. Health care had been the economy’s most reliable growth engine for the past two years — its absence in February removes the sector’s ability to cushion weakness elsewhere.
Manufacturing lost 12,000 jobs despite ongoing tariff policies designed to reshore production from overseas. The figure suggests that trade barriers alone are insufficient to reverse structural declines in domestic manufacturing employment, particularly when energy and input costs are rising sharply.
Federal government employment fell by 10,000 in February and is down 330,000 — roughly 11% of the total federal workforce — since October 2024. The administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative has directly accelerated this decline. Over the period since January 2025, the economy has created fewer than 5,000 net jobs per month on average.
The information sector lost 11,000 jobs, continuing a 12-month trend in which it has shed an average of 5,000 positions per month. Transportation and warehousing lost a further 11,000, reflecting the broader slowdown in consumer spending and the rising fuel costs that the Iran war has accelerated.
Three simultaneous forces are now compressing the US economy in ways that no single policy tool was designed to address.
The first is the Iran conflict itself. With Brent crude oil having touched $119 per barrel in the weeks since the war began, every consumer-facing business from airlines and logistics companies to retailers and manufacturers is repricing its cost base upward. That repricing takes months to fully flow through hiring decisions and payroll figures.
The second force is DOGE. The federal workforce reduction has removed hundreds of thousands of stable, mid-wage jobs from the economy at precisely the moment private-sector job creation has stalled. Federal jobs do not just support individual workers — they generate downstream spending in local economies across the country.
The third is a broader cooling in private-sector sentiment. Block, the fintech company, announced layoffs of 40% of its workforce a decision its chief investment officer described as emblematic of job bloat being unwound to fund artificial intelligence investment. The dynamic is not unique to Block: AI-related cost restructuring is accelerating layoffs across the technology and financial services sectors.
The Federal Reserve meets on March 17-18 with no comfortable path forward. The CME FedWatch tool showed a 95.5% probability that policymakers will hold the benchmark federal funds rate unchanged at its current range of 3.5% to 3.75%. Traders also pulled forward their expectation for the first rate cut to July 2026, pricing in two reductions before the end of the year.
Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, summarized the bind clearly: a collapsing labor market would normally justify a rate cut, but oil-driven inflation makes any easing move risky. Cut too soon and the Fed risks reigniting price pressures already being stoked by $119 crude. Hold too long and a weakening labor market deteriorates further without relief.
Fed Governor Christopher Waller had hinted before the report that a sufficiently weak jobs number could shift the calculus — but the Fed’s hands remain tied by the energy-price dimension of the crisis, which monetary policy cannot address.
Jerome Powell’s press conference on March 18 will be among the most closely watched in years. There is no answer that avoids pain — only a choice between two different versions of it.

Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and Morgan Stanley have all revised their US GDP forecasts downward in the wake of the combined jobs miss and Iran war oil shock. Goldman now puts the probability of a US recession in 2026 above 40% — the highest reading since the 2022 inflation peak.
White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett pushed back, arguing that reduced immigration has lowered the monthly job-creation break-even to approximately 30,000 to 40,000 positions. Economists were swift to note that a loss of 92,000 jobs does not fall within any definition of that range.
Markets opened lower following the February payrolls report and extended their declines before a partial recovery. The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down 1.27%, the S&P 500 fell 1.1%, and the Nasdaq lost 0.92%.
The reaction reveals a deeper shift in market psychology. For years, weak jobs data boosted stocks because investors expected it to accelerate Fed rate cuts — the so-called ‘bad news is good news’ dynamic. That relationship has broken down. Investors now fear that the structural damage from an Iran war, an oil shock, federal workforce cuts, and a jobs miss three times worse than forecast cannot be repaired by monetary policy alone.